Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:08:33 +0800 | From | Michael Wang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine |
| |
On 07/08/2013 04:49 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 10:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:43:25AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 14:16 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: >>> >>>> PeterZ has suggested some optimization which I sent out yesterday, I >>>> suppose they haven't been included into this test yet, correct? >>> >>> No, that was with both v3 patches applied. hackbench -l 1000 delta >>> tracked to next pull/build fwiw, but I don't see anything noteworthy >>> elsewhere, so I'm filing it under "tasks/core ~= zillion ~= hohum". >> >> OK, I'll apply the patches, we'll see what happens. If there significant >> fallout we'll immediately have more information anyway ;-) > > Yup. It's a repeatable oddity on my box, but it doesn't even track to > itself when using different hackbench parameters. All I can really > conclude from test results is "golly, changing stuff affects stuff" :)
If there is problems, they will show up sooner or later, and we just conquer them at that time ;-)
And thanks again for all the help you've done :)
Regards, Michael Wang
> > -Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
| |