Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:35:54 +0300 | From | Gleb Natapov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/kvm/emulate.c: simplify NOP (opcode 0x90) check |
| |
Please send kvm patches to kvm@vger.kernel.org too.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:27:00PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > We do not need to check for reg == RAX for opcodes 0x91...0x97. > The is no reason to optimize here. This is not performance sensitive path, far from it. If not for "clear high bits" behaviour of em_xchg() we would just call it to emulate nop.
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> > CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > CC: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> > CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > CC: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > index 2bc1e81..2dc48a1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > @@ -4544,9 +4544,14 @@ special_insn: > case 0x8d: /* lea r16/r32, m */ > ctxt->dst.val = ctxt->src.addr.mem.ea; > break; > - case 0x90 ... 0x97: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */ > + case 0x90: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */ > + /* Not all opcodes 90 are NOPs, only ones which refer to RAX */ > + /* For example, 49 90 is xchg %rax,%r8 */ > + /* Bare 90 and 40 90 (redundant REX prefix) are nop */ > if (ctxt->dst.addr.reg == reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX)) > break; > + /* Fall through */ > + case 0x91 ... 0x97: /* xchg reg, rax */ > rc = em_xchg(ctxt); > break; > case 0x98: /* cbw/cwde/cdqe */ > -- > 1.8.1.4
-- Gleb.
| |