| Date | Wed, 3 Jul 2013 20:41:24 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/13] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount |
| |
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:21:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Note that the patch still leaves shared, file-backed in VM_EXEC vmas in > place guessing that these are shared library pages. Migrating them are > likely to be of major benefit as generally the expectation would be that > these are read-shared between caches and that iTLB and iCache pressure is > generally low.
I'm failing to grasp.. we don't migrate them because migrating them would likely be beneficial?
Missing a negative somewhere?
|