Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:02:16 +0000 (UTC) | From | "Artem S. Tashkinov" <> | Subject | Re: A call to revise sockets behaviour |
| |
Jul 29, 2013 11:43:00 PM, Eric wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:47 +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote: > >> A wine developer clearly showed that this option simply doesn't work. >> >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26031#c21 >> >> Output of strace: >> getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [0], [4]) = 0 >> setsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 >> bind(24, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(43012), sin_addr=inet_addr("0. >> 0.0.0")}, 16) = -1 EADDRINUSE (Address already in use) > >Its clear that some other socket did not use SO_REUSADDR > >All sockets using a given port _must_ have use SO_REUSADDR to allow this >port being reused. >
It's exactly what's been tried. A program running with SO_REUSADDR, once no longer running consequently fails to regain the rights for the port.
| |