Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:41:27 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] |
| |
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:50:19AM -0400, jonsmirl@gmail.com wrote:
> "furture proof" is much easier to say that it is to do. We've been > messing around with the audio bindings for three years and still don't > have a really good scheme. It is pretty easy to come up with the first > 90% of a device tree. It is really hard to work out that last 10%.
I wouldn't say that for audio - we've got a pretty solid idea of what's going on and little if any churn. If some more of the subsystems that we rely on were working well we could do a bit more but it's mostly just extensions of where we're at now. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |