lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
    On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:50:19AM -0400, jonsmirl@gmail.com wrote:

    > "furture proof" is much easier to say that it is to do. We've been
    > messing around with the audio bindings for three years and still don't
    > have a really good scheme. It is pretty easy to come up with the first
    > 90% of a device tree. It is really hard to work out that last 10%.

    I wouldn't say that for audio - we've got a pretty solid idea of what's
    going on and little if any churn. If some more of the subsystems that
    we rely on were working well we could do a bit more but it's mostly just
    extensions of where we're at now.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-07-28 20:01    [W:3.841 / U:0.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site