Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:28:13 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: Ugly patches for stolen reservation |
| |
On 07/26/2013 01:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Am I being too pedantic in expecting that we still mark it > e820-reserved? > > This area really isnt an ordinary PCI resource such as a > BAR or an MMIO region. It's truly system RAM (which cannot > be moved/reallocated), used by graphics hardware, and the > firmware should have marked it reserved. > > (The end result should be the same in any case, so this is > a detail.) >
I, too, would prefer to see it marked as reserved.
-hpa
| |