lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]
From
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726:
>>
>> $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915
>> + drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file
>> + drm/i915: Use a private interface for register access within GT
>> + drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants
>> + drm/i915: Squash gen lookup through multiple indirections
>> inside GT access
>> + drm/i915: Convert the register access tracepoint to be conditional
>> + drm/i915: fix the racy object accounting
>> + drm/i915: dvo_ch7xxx: fix vsync polarity setting
>> + drm/i915: initialize gt_lock early with other spin locks
>> + Revert "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware
>> expects Windows 8"
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 2 +
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 2 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 836 +--
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 91 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 292 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 413 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 411 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 1347 ++---
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 16 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1065 ++--
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 36 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 431 +-
>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 595 +++
>>
>> Any hints which of the commits could be culprit?
>
> None, it's the vma offset manager stuff in drm-next.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 3613b50..1f76572 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ int drm_gem_mmap(struct file *filp, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma)
> }
>
> obj = container_of(node, struct drm_gem_object, vma_node);
> - ret = drm_gem_mmap_obj(obj, drm_vma_node_size(node), vma);
> + ret = drm_gem_mmap_obj(obj, drm_vma_node_size(node) << PAGE_SHIFT, vma);
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
>
> That should fix stuff up again, David Herrmann is working on a real
> patch already.
>

The fix can be found at [1].

- Sedat -

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833932/

> Cheers, Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-26 12:21    [W:0.156 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site