lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:core/locking] mutex: Fix/ document access-once assumption in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
Commit-ID:  1e40c2edef2537f87f94d0baf80aeaeb7d51cc23
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1e40c2edef2537f87f94d0baf80aeaeb7d51cc23
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:31:01 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:33:39 +0200

mutex: Fix/document access-once assumption in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()

mutex_can_spin_on_owner() is technically broken in that it would
in theory allow the compiler to load lock->owner twice, seeing a
pointer first time and a NULL pointer the second time.

Linus pointed out that a compiler has to be seriously broken to
not compile this correctly - but nevertheless this change
is correct as it will better document the implementation.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130719183101.GA20909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/mutex.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index ff05f4b..7ff48c5 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -209,11 +209,13 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
*/
static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ struct task_struct *owner;
int retval = 1;

rcu_read_lock();
- if (lock->owner)
- retval = lock->owner->on_cpu;
+ owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner);
+ if (owner)
+ retval = owner->on_cpu;
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-23 10:21    [W:0.186 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site