lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Refactor device tree maintainership
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:

> Or perhaps, we could move *.dts around in the kernel to match the
> proposed DT tree structure before that point in time?
>
> >> we will still need
> >> to copy dt-bindings into the kernel. Also, I think we should move all
> >> dts files out of arch subdirs and arrange by vendor or soc family. I'm
> >> sure there are some cases that structure doesn't fit well, but there is
> >> very little in a dts tied to a cpu architecture.
> >
> > I couldn't agree more. So:
> >
> > <root>/include/dt-bindings/vendor/*?
>
> > <root>/dts/vendor/*?
>
> I would tend to prefer that option, ...

Please make a generic top-level directory for DT and move the dtc code
in there as well. Something like:

<root>/devicetree/dtc/*
<root>/devicetree/dts/*


Nicolas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-23 22:21    [W:0.418 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site