Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:26:15 -0400 (EDT) | From | Nicolas Pitre <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Refactor device tree maintainership |
| |
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Or perhaps, we could move *.dts around in the kernel to match the > proposed DT tree structure before that point in time? > > >> we will still need > >> to copy dt-bindings into the kernel. Also, I think we should move all > >> dts files out of arch subdirs and arrange by vendor or soc family. I'm > >> sure there are some cases that structure doesn't fit well, but there is > >> very little in a dts tied to a cpu architecture. > > > > I couldn't agree more. So: > > > > <root>/include/dt-bindings/vendor/*? > > > <root>/dts/vendor/*? > > I would tend to prefer that option, ...
Please make a generic top-level directory for DT and move the dtc code in there as well. Something like:
<root>/devicetree/dtc/* <root>/devicetree/dts/*
Nicolas
| |