lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Cpufreq, cpu hotplug, suspend/resume related fixes
Date
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 02:13:42 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 09:19 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > On 07/17/2013 08:57 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> >> On 07/16/2013 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 05:15:14 PM Toralf Förster wrote:
> [...]
> >>>> sry - here again with full quote of the email :
> >>>>
> >>>> I applied patch [1/8] on top of v3.11-rc1-8-g47188d3 passes two s2ram/wakeup
> >>>> cycles fine and crashed the system at the 3rd attempt / one times just at
> >>>> the 4th (blinking power led, no sysrq, ...).
> >>>>
> >>>> Applying patch 1-8 on top of that tree differs in that way that it
> >>>> crashes now the system even at the 1st attempt or at least at the 2nd
> >>>>
> >>>> My hardware is a ThinkPad T420 with latest BIOS and a 32 bit stable
> >>>> Gentoo Linux - FWIW .config attached.
> >>>
> >>> I think you'll need the fixes first, basically [1/8] from this series and
> >>> this: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2827512/ .
> >>>
> >>> Please try to run with these two things applied only and see how that goes.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Rafael
> >>>
> >>>
> >> That was it.
> >>
> >> Applying https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2827512/ and then patch
> >> [1/8] on top of v3.11-rc1-8-g47188d3 works fine and solved the reported
> >> issue.
> >>
> >> Furthermore applying patches 2-8 works too - suspend/wakeup works fine
> >> and frequencies are scaled right after wakeup at the T420.
> >>
> >
> > Phew! Finally :-)
> >
> > Thank you for all your testing efforts!
> >
>
> Rafael, Viresh, any thoughts on picking up patches 2-8 from this series
> for 3.12?
>
> From the discussions on this thread so far, there are no pending issues:
> Toralf verified that these patches work fine on his system, as he mentioned
> above, and Tianyu Lan independently tested this patchset and found no
> issues with them. Also, Viresh analyzed the refcounting used in the patches
> and we came to the conclusion that there is no problem with them either.

Yes, I'm going to queue up that series for 3.12.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-21 15:21    [W:0.610 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site