lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND][PATCH] mm: vmstats: tlb flush counters
On 07/19/2013 08:50 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 04:38 AM, Raghavendra KT wrote:
>> While measuring non - PLE performance, one of the bottleneck, I am seeing is
>> flush tlbs.
>> perf had helped in alaysing a bit there, but this patch would help
>> in precise calculation. It will aslo help in tuning the PLE window
>> experiments (larger PLE window
>> would affect remote flush TLBs)
>
> Interesting. What workload is that? I've been having problems finding
> workloads that are too consumed with TLB flushes.
>

Dave,
ebizzy is the one. and dbench to some small extent.

[root@codeblue ~]# cat /proc/vmstat |grep nr_tlb ;
/root/data/script/do_ebizzy.sh; cat /proc/vmstat |grep nr_tlb
nr_tlb_remote_flush 721
nr_tlb_remote_flush_received 923
nr_tlb_local_flush_all 13992
nr_tlb_local_flush_one 0
nr_tlb_local_flush_one_kernel 0
7482 records/s
real 120.00 s
user 86.69 s
sys 3746.57 s
nr_tlb_remote_flush 912896
nr_tlb_remote_flush_received 28261974
nr_tlb_local_flush_all 926272
nr_tlb_local_flush_one 0
nr_tlb_local_flush_one_kernel 0



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-20 15:41    [W:2.007 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site