lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review
    On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
    > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Sarah Sharp
    > <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> wrote:
    > > I should not have to ask for professional behavior on the mailing lists.
    > > Professional behavior should be the default.
    >
    > So, what does "professional" mean? A professional is paid for his work, an
    > amateur isn't. But this doesn't say anything about code quality, maintainer
    > responsiveness, etc.
    > Does it imply behavior that (hopefully) keeps getting you paid?

    I think we're getting hung up on this specific phrase. I've interpreted
    this issue with lkml communication as a need to avoid bullying. I think
    "no bullying", while still up for heavy interpretation, is better to
    focus on than "being professional".

    -Kees

    --
    Kees Cook @outflux.net


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-07-16 17:43    [W:4.298 / U:0.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site