Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:09:40 -0700 | From | Kees Cook <> | Subject | Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review |
| |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Sarah Sharp > <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > I should not have to ask for professional behavior on the mailing lists. > > Professional behavior should be the default. > > So, what does "professional" mean? A professional is paid for his work, an > amateur isn't. But this doesn't say anything about code quality, maintainer > responsiveness, etc. > Does it imply behavior that (hopefully) keeps getting you paid?
I think we're getting hung up on this specific phrase. I've interpreted this issue with lkml communication as a need to avoid bullying. I think "no bullying", while still up for heavy interpretation, is better to focus on than "being professional".
-Kees
-- Kees Cook @outflux.net
| |