Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:25:11 +0200 | From | Jiri Slaby <> | Subject | Re: e1000e + suspend, 3.9-rc2 |
| |
Any ideas on this?
On 07/05/2013 10:24 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 06/12/2013 11:29 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >> Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> On 04/15/2013 05:29 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>>> On 03/29/2013 07:04 PM, Allan, Bruce W wrote: >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jirislaby@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jiri Slaby >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:23 AM >>>>>> To: Konstantin Khlebnikov >>>>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Rafael J. Wysocki; Bjorn >>>>>> Helgaas; >>>>>> x86@kernel.org; lkml; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Allan, >>>>>> Bruce W >>>>>> Subject: Re: e1000e + suspend, 3.9-rc2 >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, I can still see the hardware error message when suspending: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And with 3.8 plus these: >>>>>>>> PCI/PM: Clear state_saved during suspend >>>>>>>> e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance >>>>>>>> e1000e: fix runtime power management transitions >>>>>>>> e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I sometimes see this: >>>>>>>> pci_pm_suspend():e1000_suspend +0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>>>>>>> dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x140 returns -2 >>>>>>>> PM: Device 0000:00:19.0 failed to suspend async: error -2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any ideas? Am I missing some patch still? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Try this: >>>>>>> "PCI: Don't try to disable Bus Master on disconnected PCI devices" >>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2271641/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But I'm not sure, probably it is unrelated because this code works >>>>>>> only (?) >>>>>>> during shutdown/kexec sequences. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think it will help either. -2 here is -E1000_ERR_PHY from >>>>>> e1000e_write_phy_reg_mdic if I'm looking correctly. I.e. MDIC not >>>>>> ready >>>>>> or unlike MDIC_ERROR. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think this happened after I put the link down and tried to suspend. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> js >>>>>> suse labs >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for not replying sooner, for some reason some of this thread >>>>> was filtered >>>>> to my junk folder and I didn’t see it until now. >>>>> >>>>> Jiri, can you provide the output of 'lspci -s 00:19.0 -n -vv' and >>>>> confirm the scenario >>>>> in which the problem occurs? Is this easily reproduced? >>>> >>>> Sorry about the late reply, I totally forgot about this. lspci output is >>>> attached below. The scenario is not rigid as I'm not sure when exactly >>>> this happens. It looks like I have to use power saving on that device. >>>> And I don't need to use that device at all. Here is an excerpt from one >>>> kernel boot modulo e1000e where the error occurred. >>>> >>>> e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2012 Intel Corporation. >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: Interrupt Throttling Rate (ints/sec) set to dynamic >>>> conservative mode >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) >>>> 3c:97:0e:35:3d:dd >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MAC: 10, PHY: 11, PBA No: 1000FF-0FF >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>>> pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>>> pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>>> pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>>> pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>>> pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 >>> >>> This still happens with 3.9.5 ... >>> >>> I don't use wired net at all. This usually happens after I enable power >>> saving. >> >> I guess that '-2' is one of 'return -E1000_ERR_PHY', >> but all that debug messages are omitted by default. >> >> Please enable CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y and mount debugfs, after that: >> # echo module e1000e +p > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control >> If it would be too verbose you can enable these messages more selective.\ > > Here we go at last: > > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Setting page 0x6020 > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MDI Write did not complete > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Setting page 0x6020 > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MDI Write did not complete > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: failed to enable jumbo frame workaround mode > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Setting page 0x0 > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MDI Write did not complete > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Setting page 0x0 > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MDI Write did not complete > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Setting page 0x6020 > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MDI Write did not complete > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Could not set Port Control page > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Setting page 0x6020 > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: MDI Write did not complete > e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Could not set Port Control page > pci_pm_suspend(): e1000_suspend+0x0/0x10 [e1000e] returns -2 > dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x140 returns -2 > PM: Device 0000:00:19.0 failed to suspend async: error -2 > PM: Some devices failed to suspend > >>>> 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit >>>> Network Connection [8086:1502] (rev 04) >>>> Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21f3] >>>> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- >>>> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ >>>> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast>TAbort- >>>> <TAbort-<MAbort->SERR-<PERR- INTx- >>>> Latency: 0 >>>> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 46 >>>> Region 0: Memory at f2500000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) >>>> [size=128K] >>>> Region 1: Memory at f253b000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) >>>> [size=4K] >>>> Region 2: I/O ports at 5080 [size=32] >>>> Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2 >>>> Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA >>>> PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+) >>>> Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME- >>>> Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ >>>> Address: 00000000fee00398 Data: 0000 >>>> Capabilities: [e0] PCI Advanced Features >>>> AFCap: TP+ FLR+ >>>> AFCtrl: FLR- >>>> AFStatus: TP- >>>> Kernel driver in use: e1000e >>>> >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
-- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |