lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI / hotplug / ACPI: Get rid of check_sub_bridges()
Date
On Sunday, July 14, 2013 10:08:28 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:47:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 13, 2013 08:09:59 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > Now that acpiphp_check_bridge() always enumerates devices behind the
> > > bridge, there is no need to do that for each sub-bridge anymore like it is
> > > done in the current ACPI-based PCI hotplug code. Given this we don't need
> > > check_sub_bridges() anymore and can drop the function completely.
> > >
> > > This also simplifies the ACPIPHP code a bit.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > This applies on top of v3.10 with Rafael's ACPIPHP + Thunderbolt series
> > > applied:
> > >
> >
> > OK, I added it to my bleeding-edge branch along with this series:
> >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg44480.html
> >
> > rebased on top of some previous ACPI cleanup commits. I needed to make some
> > changes in the process (and fixed up some breakage reported by the auto build
> > testing), hopefully I didn't break anything. If you're in an adventurous mood,
> > testing would be welcome. ;-) [That already includes the majority of 3.11
> > material from Linus, though, so unexpected breakage elsewhere may happen.]
>
> Tried the bleeding-edge branch on both of our test machines and Thunderbolt
> still works fine.

Awesome! :-)

Thanks a lot for testing. If Bjorn doesn't hate it, I'll put the series into
linux-next after 3.11-rc1 is released.


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-14 17:41    [W:0.205 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site