Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:28:36 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Platform Framebuffers and SimpleDRM | From | David Herrmann <> |
| |
Hi
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 07/04/2013 06:25 AM, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> This series changes the way we handle firmware framebuffers on x86 systems. On >> other architectures the recently introduced "simple-framebuffer" >> platform-devices provide a sane and proper way to handle firmware framebuffers. >> So why not use it on x86, too? > > Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > > (This time I didn't see any issue with the FB content being blank; I > must have forgotten a console= command-line parameter or something the > last time around)
I think I had some error in the pseudo_palette handling (which I now copied from simplefb.c), but I am not sure why it didn't work in v1. Thanks a lot for testing!
Regards David
| |