Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:18:16 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf: add const qualifier to perf_pmu_register's 'name' arg |
| |
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:39:05PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 06/04/2013 04:33 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Simlar 'complaint' for the ARC stuff really, only marketing speak :-) > > You mean lack of prefix in this case (as opposed to MetaG).
Nah, lack of proper (!markting speak) introduction to the arch ;-)
Is there something like the Intel SDM for these archs, if so, do we want to make it easier to find them for people?
> Anyhow, this patch served a lot more purpose than Mischa really wanted - formally > introduced you to two new architectures ;-)
Yah.. it seems archs sneak up on you these days.
| |