Messages in this thread | | | From | Peter Korsgaard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: add dm9620 net usb driver | Date | Sun, 23 Jun 2013 22:00:52 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph CHANG <josright123@gmail.com> writes:
Joseph> DM9620 is an USB2.0 network adapter rather than DM9601 USB1.1. This Joseph> driver processed the RX data 4 bytes header, TX data 2 bytes header, Joseph> make the control bit exactly right in PHY write function, and optional Joseph> IFF_ALLMUTLI bit for RX control.
But dm9601.c already supports the dm9620 based devices. Why another driver for the same hardware?
Please CC me on dm9601 related patches.
Joseph> Tested good for many platforms, include X86 desktop and ARM embedded.
Joseph> +static struct usb_driver dm9620_driver = { Joseph> + .name = "dm9620", Joseph> + .id_table = products, Joseph> + .probe = usbnet_probe, Joseph> + .disconnect = usbnet_disconnect, Joseph> + .suspend = usbnet_suspend, Joseph> + .resume = usbnet_resume, Joseph> + .disable_hub_initiated_lpm = 1, Joseph> +}; Joseph> + Joseph> +module_usb_driver(dm9620_driver); Joseph> + Joseph> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>");
I'm not the author of this file.
-- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
| |