lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/perf: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() in perf_trace_##call() when possible
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 20:12 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

    > > Or is this your way to confuse me as much as my code has confused
    > > you? ;-)
    >
    > Of course! this was the main reason.

    I knew it!

    >
    >
    > Steven, I convinced myself the patch should be correct. If you agree with
    > this hack:
    >
    > - anything else I should do apart from the change above?
    >
    > - should I resend the previous "[PATCH 0/3] tracing: more
    > list_empty(perf_events) checks" series?
    >
    > This series depends on "[PATCH 3/3] tracing/perf: Move the
    > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE check into perf_trace_buf_prepare()".
    >
    > Or I can drop this patch if you do not like it and rediff.
    >
    > Just in case, there are other pending patches in trace_kprobe.c
    > which I am going to resend, but they are orthogonal.

    I'll pull in the patches and play with them. I'll let you know what I
    find.

    Thanks,


    -- Steve




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-06-19 21:21    [W:5.054 / U:1.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site