Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/perf: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() in perf_trace_##call() when possible | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:24:53 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 20:12 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Or is this your way to confuse me as much as my code has confused > > you? ;-) > > Of course! this was the main reason.
I knew it!
> > > Steven, I convinced myself the patch should be correct. If you agree with > this hack: > > - anything else I should do apart from the change above? > > - should I resend the previous "[PATCH 0/3] tracing: more > list_empty(perf_events) checks" series? > > This series depends on "[PATCH 3/3] tracing/perf: Move the > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE check into perf_trace_buf_prepare()". > > Or I can drop this patch if you do not like it and rediff. > > Just in case, there are other pending patches in trace_kprobe.c > which I am going to resend, but they are orthogonal.
I'll pull in the patches and play with them. I'll let you know what I find.
Thanks,
-- Steve
| |