Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:47:24 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio driver for Intel Baytrail platforms | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote: > [Me] >> I would still vote to put the thing in drivers/pinctrl anyway, >> I am perfectly happy to house pure GPIO drivers there, >> especially if they're obviously masking something more >> pinctrl-like in reality, it will be way more flexible the day that >> you just want to add "this one little quirk for this pin config >> thing", then it'll fit just fine. >> > > I'm fine with having it under drivers/pinctrl as a GPIO driver, either just > as it is, or by using the pinctrl_gpio_range structure and helper functions > such as gpio_to_pad(), once Christian Rupperts patch is accepted.
Christian's patch is merged into the pinctrl tree for v3.11.
> any naming preference?
> pinctrl-baytrail.c
Bingo!
Because the hardware is a pin controller after all.
I know there is some BIOS or ROM very much wanting it to look simpler than it is, but it sure is a pin controller :-)
Thanks, Linus Walleij
| |