lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] (Was: fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work())
sorry, forgot to mention...

On 06/15, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > OT: I don't think that schedule_work() needs to be inside the locked
> > region. Scalability improvements beckon!
>
> Yeees, I thought about this too.
>
> Performance-wise this can't really help, this case is unlikely. But
> I think this change makes this code a bit simpler, so please see 1/3.

This is on top of
fput-task_work_add-can-fail-if-the-caller-has-passed-exit_task_work-fix.patch

it textually depends on the comment block in fput() added by that patch.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-15 20:01    [W:0.044 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site