Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 6 May 2013 10:07:37 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Demand proper privileges for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL |
| |
> > @@ -318,8 +318,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event) > > if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER) > > mask |= X86_BR_USER; > > > > - if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) > > + if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) { > > + if (perf_paranoid_kernel() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > > + return -EACCES; > > It is probably not too late to amend this patch and remove the "-EACCES": > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c: In function ‘intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter’: > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c:323:4: warning: ‘return’ with a value, in function returning void [enabled by default]
Oh urgh, looks like I forgot a refresh before posting..
This one actually compiles a defconfig bzImage.
--- Subject: perf, x86, lbr: Demand proper privileges for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Fri May 03 14:07:49 CEST 2013
We should always have proper privileges when requesting kernel data.
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: eranian@google.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-deb8yrh5fq2bijn5tlmezkmd@git.kernel.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void) * - in case there is no HW filter * - in case the HW filter has errata or limitations */ -static void intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event) +static int intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event) { u64 br_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type; int mask = 0; @@ -318,8 +318,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filte if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER) mask |= X86_BR_USER; - if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) + if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) { + if (perf_paranoid_kernel() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EACCES; mask |= X86_BR_KERNEL; + } /* we ignore BRANCH_HV here */ @@ -339,6 +342,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filte * be used by fixup code for some CPU */ event->hw.branch_reg.reg = mask; + + return 0; } /* @@ -375,7 +380,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter int intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event) { - int ret = 0; + int ret; /* * no LBR on this PMU @@ -386,7 +391,9 @@ int intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(struct pe /* * setup SW LBR filter */ - intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(event); + ret = intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(event); + if (ret) + return ret; /* * setup HW LBR filter, if any
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |