Messages in this thread | | | From | Tim Hockin <> | Date | Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:09:09 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8 |
| |
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:43:03AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: >> A year later - what ever happened with this? I want it more than ever >> for Google's use. > > I think the conclusion was "use kmemcg instead".
Pardon my ignorance, but... what? Use kernel memory limits as a proxy for process/thread counts? That sounds terrible - I hope I am misunderstanding? This task counter patch had several properties that mapped very well to what we want.
Is it dead in the water?
| |