lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
Hello, Peter.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 16:58 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > There is not enough reason to place this checking at
> > update_sg_lb_stats(),
> > except saving one iteration for sched_group_cpus. But with this
> > change,
> > we can save two memset cost and can expect better compiler
> > optimization,
> > so clean-up may be more beneficial to us.
>
> It would be good if you'd described what you actually did, there's a
> lot of code movement and now I have to figure out wth you did and why.

Okay. I will do that when respin.

Thanks.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-01 07:41    [W:0.099 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site