lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] compat/compat-drivers/linux-next: fb skip_vt_switch
> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
> > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So
> > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
>
> Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I
> decided to not add a bool false setting for the structure field given
> that the assumption is this would not be something dynamic, and data
> structure would be kzalloc()'d so by default they are 0.

What do you do about the test, though?

julia


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-29 08:01    [W:0.555 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site