lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot
From
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>:
> [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>
>> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf), nohz_extended_mask);
>> > + pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n", nohz_ext_buf);
>>
>> I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending anything
>> experimental to Linus: we'll send something that is tested and that we
>> expect to not break anything. (and which we'll fix if it does)
>
> In that case, should we vector a patch through PaulM to clobber these too?
>
> $ git grep xperiment |grep rcu
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: printk(KERN_INFO "\tExperimental boot-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n", rcu_fanout_leaf);
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental no-CBs CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf);
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental polled no-CBs CPUs.\n");

Hehe, that's indeed what I inspired from ;-)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-29 02:01    [W:0.190 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site