Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Mar 2013 01:39:04 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> |
| |
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>: > [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> >> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf), nohz_extended_mask); >> > + pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n", nohz_ext_buf); >> >> I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending anything >> experimental to Linus: we'll send something that is tested and that we >> expect to not break anything. (and which we'll fix if it does) > > In that case, should we vector a patch through PaulM to clobber these too? > > $ git grep xperiment |grep rcu > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: printk(KERN_INFO "\tExperimental boot-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n", rcu_fanout_leaf); > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental no-CBs CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf); > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental polled no-CBs CPUs.\n");
Hehe, that's indeed what I inspired from ;-)
| |