lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2, RFC 07/30] thp, mm: introduce mapping_can_have_hugepages() predicate
Date
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space *m)
> > +{
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m);
> > + return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> I did a quick search in all your patches and don't see __GFP_COMP
> getting _set_ anywhere. Am I missing something?

__GFP_COMP is part of GFP_TRANSHUGE. We set it for ramfs in patch 20/30.

--
Kirill A. Shutemov


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-22 12:01    [W:0.660 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site