| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2, RFC 07/30] thp, mm: introduce mapping_can_have_hugepages() predicate | Date | Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:12:11 +0200 (EET) |
| |
Dave Hansen wrote: > On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > +static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space *m) > > +{ > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) { > > + gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m); > > + return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP); > > + } > > + > > + return false; > > +} > > I did a quick search in all your patches and don't see __GFP_COMP > getting _set_ anywhere. Am I missing something?
__GFP_COMP is part of GFP_TRANSHUGE. We set it for ramfs in patch 20/30.
-- Kirill A. Shutemov
|