Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:13:59 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere |
| |
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote: > > >> I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet > >> will do it for arch/arc. > > After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in > -next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next.
It arrived in next-21030220.
> >> Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy > >> way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged > >> is below. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > > FWIW: > > Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> (for arch/metag) > > > Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> (for arch/arc) > > So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree > arches and your's will take care of metag/arc.
The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch set (since it is still based on top of linux-next). It usually is merged pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |