Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:18:41 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: prctl(PR_SET_MM) |
| |
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:00:28 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> wrote:
> From: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@miso.sublimeip.com> > Subject: prctl: Make PR_SET_MM being depend on own CONFIG_MM_FIELDS_SETTING > > ... > > Signed-off-by: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@miso.sublimeip.com>
The "..." makes me sad.
If/when this patch gets sent for real, please explain the reasons? AFAICT it permits the enabling of prctl(PR_SET_MM) in CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=n kernels. If that was indeed the intent, why?
| |