lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Subjectpm_idle cleanup patch series
    Date
    Use of (pm_idle)() spread from x86 to a number of architectures.
    Some used it like x86, but most copied it for no functional reason.

    There is no Linux architecture-independent code that mandates
    that an architecture supply a pm_idle().
    So we delete it from pm.h and we either remove it
    or re-name it to be private to each architecture.

    It is a safe bet that I fat-fingered something in this series.
    Please send me an Ack if you can build/test or I broke
    your favorite machine.

    In particular, for those with computer museums,
    I'd like help testing the APM patch, which is
    compile-tested only.

    thanks,
    Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-02-10 07:41    [W:3.349 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site