lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86, irq, fix logical AND/OR error in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()


On 12/27/2013 08:07 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/27/2013 08:13 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>>
>>> Back to my question, assume cpu1 will be off-lined and one irq affinity is
>>> set as (1, 2) -- this irq will be bypassed. Looks good. But if one irq
>>> affinity is set as only (1), -- this irq is bypassed, too. Not right!
>>
>> Oh, yes, this is a bug. ... and as you point out ...
>>
>
> Does this mean the patch that is currently in my tree should not be
> pushed to Linus? It sounds like that to me...

Yes, hpa -- please drop the patch. I will resubmit an updated patch after testing.

P.

>
> -hpa
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-28 17:41    [W:0.062 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site