Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | [PATCH 3/3] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq | Date | Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:23:37 +0100 |
| |
Abusing rq->csd.list for a list of requests to complete is rather ugly. Especially since using queuelist should be safe and much cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- block/blk-softirq.c | 12 ++++++------ include/linux/smp.h | 6 +----- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-softirq.c b/block/blk-softirq.c index 57790c1a97eb..7ea5534096d5 100644 --- a/block/blk-softirq.c +++ b/block/blk-softirq.c @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ static void blk_done_softirq(struct softirq_action *h) while (!list_empty(&local_list)) { struct request *rq; - rq = list_entry(local_list.next, struct request, csd.list); - list_del_init(&rq->csd.list); + rq = list_entry(local_list.next, struct request, queuelist); + list_del_init(&rq->queuelist); rq->q->softirq_done_fn(rq); } } @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ static void trigger_softirq(void *data) local_irq_save(flags); list = this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_done); - list_add_tail(&rq->csd.list, list); + list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, list); - if (list->next == &rq->csd.list) + if (list->next == &rq->queuelist) raise_softirq_irqoff(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ); local_irq_restore(flags); @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void __blk_complete_request(struct request *req) struct list_head *list; do_local: list = this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_done); - list_add_tail(&req->csd.list, list); + list_add_tail(&req->queuelist, list); /* * if the list only contains our just added request, @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ do_local: * entries there, someone already raised the irq but it * hasn't run yet. */ - if (list->next == &req->csd.list) + if (list->next == &req->queuelist) raise_softirq_irqoff(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ); } else if (raise_blk_irq(ccpu, req)) goto do_local; diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h index c0f38018c195..9a1b8ba05924 100644 --- a/include/linux/smp.h +++ b/include/linux/smp.h @@ -17,11 +17,7 @@ extern void cpu_idle(void); typedef void (*smp_call_func_t)(void *info); struct call_single_data { - /* We still need list_head because of abuse by a block layer */ - union { - struct list_head list; - struct llist_node llist; - }; + struct llist_node llist; smp_call_func_t func; void *info; u16 flags; -- 1.8.1.4
| |