Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:42:51 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] rcusync: introduce struct rcu_sync_ops |
| |
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:38:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > > As all the rcu_synchronization() methods (on non UP) are quite > > expensive, I doubt that this optimization is worth anything. > > Maybe. It just annoys me, because afaik, the function that gets called > is always static per callsite.
Yes, very much so indeed. Worst is that we have no users of the regular RCU and RCU_BH variants and only included them for completeness since the general operation is just as valid for those.
| |