lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] init: make init failures more explicit
From
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Michael Opdenacker
<michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> + pr_err("Starting init: %s exists but couldn't execute it (error: %d - see errno-base.h and errno.h)\n",

IMHO the "- see errno-base.h and errno.h" is a bit overkill.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-18 14:41    [W:0.035 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site