lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S: Add support for hwrng found on some powernv systems
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:23:20PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:39:08AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:34:26PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:06:59AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > Il 26/09/2013 08:31, Michael Ellerman ha scritto:
> > > > > Some powernv systems include a hwrng. Guests can access it via the
> > > > > H_RANDOM hcall.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any reason to do this in the kernel?
> > >
> > > It's less code, and it's faster :)
> > >
> > > > It does not have to be a particularly fast path;
> > >
> > > Sure, but do we have to make it slow on purpose?
> > >
> > We do not put non performance critical devices into the kernel.
>
> It's not a device, it's a single hypercall, specified by PAPR, which
> is the moral equivalent of x86's RDRAND.
>
OK. A couple of general questions. How guest knows when this hypercall
is available? Is QEMU enable it when KVM_CAP_PPC_HWRNG is available (I
haven't seen userspace patch that uses KVM_CAP_PPC_HWRNG)? What about
QEMU TCG does it implement this hypercall or it emulates hwrng directly?

--
Gleb.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-01 12:41    [W:0.092 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site