lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC Patch v1 00/31] Synopsys ARC Linux kernel Port
On Saturday 19 January 2013 01:16 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2012-11-20 19:47:58, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>>> https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> All comments/criticisms are welcome !
>>>> Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
>>>> 10 minutes to figure out. I guess theres no alternate name arc could
>>>> use?
>>> Hmm... "Advanced Risc"... :-(.
>>>
>>> Ok, plus there's already computing standard called "arc".
>>>
>>> https://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/ARC
>>>
>>> What about calling the architecture "sarc" or "syarc" ?
>> I think it would be best use of everybody's time if you could focus on
>> the technical content of the port rather than the name. It has been like
>> that for +10 years and I don't intend to make the kernel port name
>> different from THE arch name itself.
> Yeah, and it is best use of reviewers time to confuse them with
> one-letter difference to very popular architecture... and use three
> letter acronym that was already taken.
>
> In this state, I hope your port never gets merged. Yes, I got used to
> do cd a<tab>/ar<tab>.
> Pavel

Although I really don't want to spend time arguing with you but still ...... if
you had a neighbor with same name as your friend your strategy most likely would
be to force one of them to change names - kind of seems funny and stupid.

Having said that, despite all the ranting so far, you've not managed to comment on
a single line of the actual code, which is more funny and stupid. So please stop
blathering and do some constructive work. I won't go around asking ARC name to be
changed because someone's Tab completion doesn't work anymore.

And I'm sorry dude, that alone won't prevent the port from being merged.

-Vineet



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-19 14:01    [W:0.145 / U:0.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site