[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited

To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
situation in #execve2
and consider sending the corresponding patches for missing architectures.

What's getting done is unification of sys_execve()/kernel_execve()
into arch-independent code. x86, alpha, arm, s390, um and ppc are already
converted in #execve2. The plan is:

* provide a new primitive - ret_from_kernel_execve(); it takes two pointers
to struct pt_regs, one being the normal location of pt_regs for a userland
process, another - new pt_regs just filled by do_execve(). It should copy
the latter to the former and bugger off to userland. Called from generic
kernel_execve() implementation (see fs/exec.c in #execve2). It almost always
has to be done in assembler - normally it does equivalent of something
along the lines of
memmove(normal, new, sizeof(struct pt_regs))
sp = normal, or whatever is needed to get a valid stack
frame (e.g. on s390 there's ->back_chain that needs to be set to
set other registers ret_from_sys_call expects to be set (e.g.
i386 syscall entry has current_thread_info() value cached in %ebp and
since it's a callee-saved register there, ret_from_sys_call expects to
find that value still in %ebp, so we need to set it); basically, check
what has to be set in ret_from_fork - it tends to jump to the same place.
goto ret_from_sys_call, or whatever the equivalent is called on
particular architecture.
* define __ARCH_WANT_KERNEL_EXECVE in unistd.h, remove your old kernel_execve()
* pull whatever work you'd been doing *after* do_execve() call in your
sys_execve() (most of the architectures don't do anything after that anyway)
into start_thread(); that's the point of no return for execve(2) and if we
get there, we'll either succeed or get killed with SIGKILL. The same goes
for compat variant of execve(), with s/start_thread/compat_start_thread/.
* define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_EXECVE in unistd.h, kill your sys_execve() and
compat counterpart (if any).
* if there's a better way to calculate task_pt_regs(current), you can provide
it in your ptrace.h - macro should be called current_pt_regs(); it's optional.

Status: x86, arm, um, s390 - converted, tested, seem to work. alpha
and ppc - need testing. The rest - hadn't touched yet. unicore32 and
blackfin should be trivial to convert (they are doing kernel_execve() in
that manner already). Other may be more or less tricky - depends on how
gnarly their return from syscall path happens to be. I'll do what I can
and test what I can (some on emulators, some on real hardware), but for quite
a few architectures I've no way to test. Nor am I fond of sniffing dozens
of variants of assembler glue, to put it mildly.

Patches and/or help with testing setups would be very welcome.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-07 21:03    [W:0.263 / U:24.008 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site