lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] usb: move phy driver from mach-tegra to drivers/usb
    Hi,

    On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@wwwdotorg.org]
    > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:19 AM
    > > To: balbi@ti.com
    > > Cc: Venu Byravarasu; ccross@android.com; olof@lixom.net;
    > > linux@arm.linux.org.uk; stern@rowland.harvard.edu;
    > > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
    > > tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
    > > usb@vger.kernel.org
    > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: move phy driver from mach-tegra to drivers/usb
    > >
    > > On 08/31/2012 12:45 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
    > > > As part of this patch:
    > > > 1. Moved existing tegra phy driver to drivers/USB directory.
    > > > 2. Added standard USB phy driver APIs to tegra phy driver.
    > > >
    > > > Signed-off-by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>
    > >
    > > Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
    > >
    > > Felipe, Would it be possible to apply this patch to a topic branch, so
    > > that I can merge it into the Tegra tree? The reason is that I'd like to
    > > remove Tegra's devices.[ch] in kernel 3.7, but to do that, I need to
    > > move a tiny chunk of code out of that file somewhere else, and doing
    > > that relies on adding a #include to usb_phy.h/tegra_usb_phy.h, which is
    > > renamed in this patch.
    > >
    > > Alternatively, if you don't think it'll cause any merge conflicts with
    > > the USB PHY tree, I can just take this patch through the Tegra tree if
    > > you want. Venu, do you plan any other patches within the next couple
    > > weeks or so (i.e. before 3.6-rc6) that will depend on this patch? If so,
    > > taking it only through the Tegra tree might not work so well.
    >
    > Thanks Stephen for verifying the changes.
    > I'm planning to push next patches, with tegra3 phy support added, very soon.

    Unfortunately the patch didn't apply on my xceiv branch. Could you
    rebase on top of that ?

    thanks a lot

    --
    balbi
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-09-05 15:42    [W:4.405 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site