lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Fix build error caused by broken PCH_PTP module dependency.
On 09/28/2012 02:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Haicheng Li<haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:41:43 +0800
>
>> On 09/28/2012 06:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> Look at how other people submit patches, do any other patch
>>> submissions
>>> look like your's having all of this metadata in the message body:
>> I'm sorry for it.
>>
>>> As for this specific patch:
>>>
>>>> - depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>>>> + depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH = PCH_GBE
>>>
>>> This is not the correct way to ensure that the module'ness of one
>>> config option meets the module'ness requirements of another.
>>> The correct way is to say something like "&& (PCH_GBE || PCH_GBE=n)"
>>
>> This case is a little bit tricky than usual, with PCH_PTP selected,
>> the valid config would be either "PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH=PCH_GBE=m" or
>> "PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH=PCH_GBE=y", and PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH depends on
>> PCH_GBE.
>
> And a simple "&& PCH_GBE" should accomplish this, no?
No sir. it's actually same with the original Kconfig (by a if PCH_GBE"), it
just failed with this config:

CONFIG_PCH_GBE=y
CONFIG_PCH_PTP=y
CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK=m

-haicheng


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-28 10:01    [W:0.106 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site