lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif: set device capabilities
Date
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 15:48:10 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tue 25 September 2012 15:26:11 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue 25 September 2012 13:49:16 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> Hi Hans,
> > >>
> > >> On Tuesday 25 September 2012 13:43:36 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > >> > On Tue 25 September 2012 13:16:24 Prabhakar wrote:
> > >> > > From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@ti.com>
> > >> > > Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > >
> > >> > > drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 4 +++-
> > >> > > drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_display.c | 4 +++-
> > >> > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > >> > > b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c index
> > >> > > 4828888..faeca98
> > >> > > 100644
> > >> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > >> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > >> > > @@ -1630,7 +1630,9 @@ static int vpif_querycap(struct file *file,
> > >> > > void
> > >> > > *priv,>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > {
> > >> > >
> > >> > > struct vpif_capture_config *config = vpif_dev->platform_data;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - cap->capabilities = V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE | V4L2_CAP_STREAMING;
> > >> > > + cap->device_caps = V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE | V4L2_CAP_STREAMING |
> > >> > > + V4L2_CAP_READWRITE;
> > >> > > + cap->capabilities = cap->device_caps | V4L2_CAP_DEVICE_CAPS;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > strlcpy(cap->driver, "vpif capture", sizeof(cap->driver));
> > >> >
> > >> > This should be the real driver name which is 'vpif_capture'.
> > >> >
> > >> > > strlcpy(cap->bus_info, "VPIF Platform", sizeof(cap->bus_info));
> > >> >
> > >> > For bus_info I would use: "platform:vpif_capture".
> > >> >
> > >> > The 'platform:' prefix is going to be the standard for platform
> > >> > drivers.
> > >>
> > >> What about
> > >>
> > >> snprintf(cap->driver, sizeof(cap->driver), "platform:%s",
> > >> dev_name(vpif_dev));
> > >>
> > >> That would handle cases where multiple platform devices of the same
> > >> type are present.
> > >
> > > Sure, that's even better. You do have to check that this gives you what
> > > you'd expect (i.e., that you don't end up with
> > > "platform:platform:vpif_capture").>
> > But the driver field is max 16, should i extend it to 32 ?
>
> I'm certain Laurent meant to say:
>
> snprintf(cap->bus_info, sizeof(cap->bus_info), "platform:%s",
> dev_name(vpif_dev));

Yes that's what I meant, sorry.

> It makes no sense to use cap->driver.

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-25 17:41    [W:0.054 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site