lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: Work queue questions
    From
    Hello,

    On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:05 PM, anish singh
    <anish198519851985@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Assuming single core,Is my explanation correct about concurrency?

    Yes, for bound workqueues, that's correct. Concurrency management
    doesn't apply to unbound ones tho. Didn't notice Deepawali's test case
    either just didn't take long enough for the scheduler to interleave
    the workers or is using a workqueue w/ max_active == 1. I'm afraid
    this won't be a particularly productive discussion without the source
    code. For more details, please read Documentation/workqueue.txt.

    Thanks.

    --
    tejun


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-09-22 08:41    [W:0.028 / U:29.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site