Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:16:11 +1000 | From | Greg Ungerer <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited |
| |
On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: >> Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread >> branch. >> >> Mark Salter (3): >> c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread() >> c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve >> c6x: switch to generic sys_execve > > Applied and pushed... > > FWIW, the current status: > > alpha - done, tested on hardware > arm - done, tested on qemu > c6x - done by maintainer > frv - done, untested > m68k - done, tested on aranym; there's a known issue in copy_thread() in > case of coldfire-MMU, presumably to be handled in m68k tree (I can do it > in this one instead, if m68k folks would prefer it that way)
I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind if you would rather take it with your changes.
Regards Greg
| |