lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
>> Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
>> branch.
>>
>> Mark Salter (3):
>> c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
>> c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve
>> c6x: switch to generic sys_execve
>
> Applied and pushed...
>
> FWIW, the current status:
>
> alpha - done, tested on hardware
> arm - done, tested on qemu
> c6x - done by maintainer
> frv - done, untested
> m68k - done, tested on aranym; there's a known issue in copy_thread() in
> case of coldfire-MMU, presumably to be handled in m68k tree (I can do it
> in this one instead, if m68k folks would prefer it that way)

I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2

I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
if you would rather take it with your changes.

Regards
Greg



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-22 14:01    [W:0.099 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site