Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:02:04 -0700 | From | Anton Vorontsov <> | Subject | Re: [patch] da9052-battery: don't free IRQ that wasn't requested |
| |
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:07:58AM -0700, Dan Carpenter wrote: [...] > > for (j=0; j <= i ;j++ ) { > ^^^^^^ > The count up loops are prone to the exact same off by one bugs. ;) > You've got one in your sample code. Plus I'd have to declare > another variable and send a v2 patch and I am very lazy... So in > this case I think should just take my original patch.
Applied, thank you!
| |