Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: lve module taint? | Date | Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:29:02 +0930 |
| |
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:58:09AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 19.09.2012 06:02, Rusty Russell wrote: >> This is setting a, in my opinion, rather bad precedent. Next we'll >> be adding various modules here due to various reasons.
We have, that bridge has already been crossed. I wasn't asking about the patch itself.
My question was simply whether the lve module is still claiming to be GPL without being compliant or not.
Cheers, Rusty.
| |