Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:37:02 -0400 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [NEW DRIVER V3 8/8] DA9058 REGULATOR driver |
| |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:07:11PM +0000, Opensource [Anthony Olech] wrote:
> > > Can you suggest a future proofed way of using the new regulator API > > > that would solve my problem?
> > As I said you should set the voltage as part of the set voltage operation.
> So I will have to write my own set_voltage_sel() callback instead of using > the default regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap() ??
Yes.
> Well, I did try hard to use your defaults, but I suppose there is nothing to > stop me calling regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap() explicitly as the first > part of my set_voltage_sel() callback before setting the ramp_enable bit. > Then my implemenation of the set_voltage_time_sel() callback needs to > just simply return the ramp time.
The point with using the framework stuff is that you should factor out common code, if what you have is not common code then don't do crazy things in other ops to try to paper over that.
| |