Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] dmaengine: Pass no_wakeup parameter via device_prep_dma_cyclic() callback | From | Vinod Koul <> | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:30:10 +0530 |
| |
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 09:31 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:01:23AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > Change the parameter list of device_prep_dma_cyclic() so the DMA drivers > > > can receive the no_wakeup request coming from client drivers. > > > This feature can be used during audio operation to disable all audio > > > related interrupts. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> > > > CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > > > CC: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> > > > CC: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> > > > CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> > > > CC: Vista Silicon <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> > > > CC: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> > > > CC: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > > CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> > > > > After some discussion with clever people I know I have come to the conclusion > > that this is a good idea, so: > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > NAKed-by: me > > If you look at the other sub-threads of the patch you're acking, you'll > notice that there's a v3 of this patch set which changes the way this is > done. Was it a genuine mistake, think v3 reply v2? Or less caffeine..... :)
-- ~Vinod
| |