[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] coredump: add a new elf note with siginfo fields of the signal
    On 09/13/2012 06:25 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
    > I agree with Oleg. If there is an NT_SIGINFO note, it should contain
    > exactly the siginfo_t layout and data that we otherwise expose to userland
    > already. That is, it must match what PTRACE_GETSIGINFO reports, which (I
    > think) also matches exactly what appears on the stack for a signal
    > delivery.

    Agreed. Please. One note though:

    PTRACE_GETSIGINFO always returns the siginfo_t in the architecture/bitness
    of the kernel. IOW, PTRACE_GETSIGINFO on a 32-bit debuggee, running on a
    64-bit kernel, returns the siginfo_t in 64-bit layout. IOW, copy_siginfo_to_user32
    doesn't apply). Or maybe that's the architecture of the tracer, instead of the kernel.
    Haven't really checked. In any case, GDB has to basically duplicate the kernel's
    copy_siginfo_to_user/from_user for each supported arch (that does biarch) because
    of this, for "(gdb) print $_siginfo".
    I wish we had a PTRACE_GETSIGINFO variant that returned the siginfo_t in
    layout of the program, not the kernel's..

    > Note also that compat_binfmt_elf must deliver the 32-bit version
    > of siginfo_t, i.e. as copy_siginfo_to_user32 does.

    Pedro Alves

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-09-17 13:21    [W:0.023 / U:87.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site