Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:36:47 +0800 | From | Zheng Liu <> | Subject | Re: Storage related regression in linux-next 20120824 |
| |
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:50:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 09/09/2012 04:36 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote: > >>I'll send Linus a patch to disable. > > > >Thanks, but no, the change in question hasn't reached Linus yet, it's > >just a linux-next or mmotm thing - isn't it? > > Yep, libata-dev#upstream. Sorry, got my own branches confused for a > second there.
Sorry for delay reply. In our product system, we tested a lot of different brands of SATA disks, and it is OK after fua is enabled on default. Certainly we can't test all disks. :-(
So I think we quite have to revert my patch now, and try to fix the current problem.
Regards, Zheng
| |