Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:59:29 +0100 | | From | Mark Brown <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots |
| |
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > In general, it seems easier to use the same domain type for both cases. > I don't think that MOP500_AB8500_VIR_GPIO_IRQ_BASE is used anywhere > else besides the .irq_base definition in board-mop500.c, so I would guess > that you can just remove that identifier and always use the linear > domain.
Given how easy this is to get working it doesn't seem sensible to avoid it - there's a clear pattern already for maintaining support for legacy domains.
|  |