lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences
On 08/07/2012 01:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/05/2012 08:27 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
>> On 08/04/2012 11:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:46AM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
>>>> On Fri 03 Aug 2012 03:11:12 AM JST, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I missed some of the earlier bits of the thread here but why can't
>>>>> we do
>>>>> device based lookups?
> ...
>> I think we only have two choices for this:
>>
>> 1) Stick to the scheme where resources are declared at the device level,
>> such as they can be referenced by name in the sub-nodes (basically what
>> I did in this patch):
>>
>> backlight {
>> compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>> ...
>> backlight-supply = <&backlight_reg>;
>>
>> power-on-sequence {
>> step@0 {
>> regulator = "backlight";
>> enable;
>> };
>>
>> This would translate by a get_regulator(dev, "backlight") in the code
>> which would be properly resolved.
>
> Yes, upon reflection, that scheme does make sense. I withdraw the
> comments I made re: whether it'd be better to just stick the phandles
> into the steps.

Right - having the phandles directly in the sequences has its merits,
but logically speaking resources are related to a device, so this
declarative approach is probably closer to reality anyway.

I will revise the patch according to all the feedback received and
submit a new version soon.

Thanks,
Alex.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-07 08:01    [W:0.102 / U:1.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site