[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC v2 1/7] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
    On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:29:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
    > >
    > > I actually meant an enclosing struct. When you're defining a struct
    > > member, simply putting the storage after a struct with var array
    > > should be good enough. If that doesn't work, quite a few things in
    > > the kernel will break.
    > The unsigned member of a struct has to be the last one, so your struct
    > won't work.

    I suppose you mean unsized. I remember this working. Maybe I'm
    confusing it with zero-sized array. Hmm... gcc doesn't complain about
    the following. --std=c99 seems happy too.

    #include <stdio.h>

    struct A {
    int i;
    long ar[];

    struct B {
    struct A a;
    long ar_storage[32];

    int main(void)
    printf("sizeof(A)=%zd sizeof(B)=%zd\n", sizeof(struct A), sizeof(struct B));
    return 0;

    $ ./a.out
    sizeof(A)=8 sizeof(B)=264


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-08-04 01:21    [W:0.021 / U:77.360 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site